Lan Mi vs Rebecca Munk Mortensen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Mi vs R. Munk Mortensen

Lan Mi
CHN
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
20
Age
19
-
Height
-
859
C. Rank
637
815
Best Rank
567
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Rebecca Munk Mortensen
DEN
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
20
Age
19
-
Height
-
859
C. Rank
637
815
Best Rank
567
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Mi 0 - 0 Mortensen
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Mi | 0 |
Mortensen | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
no past h2h happened.
L. Mi vs R. M. Mortensen H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.93% (33-23) | Career Total W/L | 59.77% (104-70) |
0 | Titles | 3 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
L. Mi vs R. M. Mortensen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lan Mi has won 36.50% of points on their second serve, while Rebecca Munk Mortensen has won 37.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lan Mi, in recent form, has won 51.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rebecca Munk Mortensen has won 52.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.59% and 33.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lan Mi has saved 44.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rebecca Munk Mortensen has saved 46.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lan Mi has won 51.52% of matches played (W/L 17/16), with Rebecca Munk Mortensen winning 58.06% (W/L 36/26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lan Mi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 32/20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Rebecca Munk Mortensen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 14/14).
- Player level: In the last year, Lan Mi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.90% of matches (W/L 13/8), where as Rebecca Munk Mortensen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.38% of matches (W/L 19/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lan Mi has played against opponents with an average rank of 371.88 while Rebecca Munk Mortensen has played against players with an average rank of 363.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lan Mi has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rebecca Munk Mortensen has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lan Mi has converted 51.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rebecca Munk Mortensen has converted 36.30% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Lan Mi vs Rebecca Munk Mortensen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Mi 44%, Mortensen 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mi 59%, Mortensen 60%.
Break Points Saved %: Mi 45%, Mortensen 56%.
L. Mi Recent Matches Played
R. M. Mortensen Recent Matches Played

L. Mi vs R. M. Mortensen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.93% (33/23) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.77% (104/70) |
58.27% (74/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.76% (228/160) |
54.16% (612/518) | Games Win/Loss | 54.45% (1877/1570) |
61.54% (32/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.49% (40/23) |
33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.24% (50/33) |
0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (14/14) |
0 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
2 | Aces Total | 212 |
0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.44 |
48 | Total Double Faults | 737 |
1:41:45 | Average Match Time | 1:27:33 |
368.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 131.36 |
83% (2734/3276) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6061/10006) |
53% (1438/2734) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3765/6041) |
46% (249/542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1779/4005) |
51% (238/464) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (657/1288) |
49% (1673/3386) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4585/9649) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 57.47% (50/37) |
62.96% (17/10) | Futures W/L | 67.09% (53/26) |
58% (32/55) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (102/171) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
42% (5/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (11/28) |
43% (6/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (22/43) |
88% (33/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (107/93) |
12% (33/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (107/14) |
17% (23/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (67/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 PM 08/10/25
PredictionW1
1.36
W2
2.96
08:00 PM 08/10/25
PredictionW1
2.3
W2
1.57
04:05 PM 08/10/25
PredictionW1
4.3
W2
1.178
08:00 PM 08/10/25
PredictionW1
1.82
W2
1.909
10:00 AM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
2.08
W2
1.69
06:30 PM 09/10/25
PredictionW1
1.23
W2
3.84
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
Top Predictions Today
06:00
H2H 3-2
07:30
H2H 3-2
14:00
H2H 1-4
16:25
H2H 1-2
15:30
H2H 0-3
Tennis Events This Week
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
China
Cali Challenger
Colombia
Fairfield Challenger
United States
Hersonissos 5 Challenger
Greece
Jinan Challenger
China
Roanne Challenger
France
Valencia Challenger
Spain
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Lexington
United States
M15 Pontevedra
Spain
M15 Rodez
France
M25 Kigali
Rwanda
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Perth
Australia
M25 Rio de Janeiro
Brazil